Nicholas Asher & Linton Wang (2003), “Unspecification, Ambiguity, and Anaphora with Plurals”:http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/philosophy/faculty/asher/papers/salt-superfinal3.pdf, Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13 (SALT 13), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, May, 2003.
bq. Abstract We provide examples of plurals related to ambiguity and anaphora that pose problems or are counterexamples for current approaches to plurals. We then propose a dynamic semantics based on an extension of dynamic predicate logic (DPL+) to handle these examples. On our theory, different readings of sentences or discourses containing plurals don’t arise from a postulated ambiguity of plural terms or predicates applying to plural DPs, but follow rather from different types of dynamic transitions that manipulate inputs and outputs from formulas or discourse constituents. Many aspects of meaning can affect the type dynamic transitions: the lexical semantics of predicates to the left and right of a transition, and number features of DPs and discourse constraints like parallelism.
Home > About This Post
This entry was posted by fintel on Wednesday, July 30th, 2003, at 3:50 pm.
Subscribe to the
RSS 2.0 feed for all comments to this post.
Post a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.