<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essential Readings in Semantics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semantics-online.org/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semantics-online.org/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics</link>
	<description>A weblog on semantics, pragmatics, philosophy of language, and intersections thereof</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Potts</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I share Kai's concerns about having books and dissertations on this list.  If they are truly worth a spot, then they demand many months with furrowed brows.  So here are replacements for two of the long items on my earlier list:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Beaver, David Ian. 1997. Presupposition. In Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, eds., Handbook of Logic and Language, 939--1008. Cambridge, MA and Amsterdam: MIT Press and North-Holland.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;a first-rate primer for Gazdar, Karttunen, Heim,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;van der  Sandt, and others&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gunlogson, Christine. 2002.  Declarative questions.  In Brendan Jackson, ed., Proceedings of SALT 12.  Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the essence of her dissertation&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share Kai&#8217;s concerns about having books and dissertations on this list.  If they are truly worth a spot, then they demand many months with furrowed brows.  So here are replacements for two of the long items on my earlier list:</p>
<p>Beaver, David Ian. 1997. Presupposition. In Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, eds., Handbook of Logic and Language, 939&#8211;1008. Cambridge, MA and Amsterdam: MIT Press and North-Holland.</p>
<p>a first-rate primer for Gazdar, Karttunen, Heim,</p>
<p>van der  Sandt, and others</p>
<p>Gunlogson, Christine. 2002.  Declarative questions.  In Brendan Jackson, ed., Proceedings of SALT 12.  Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.</p>
<p>the essence of her dissertation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Alonso-Ovalle</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Alonso-Ovalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-38</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Kai,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice post.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why not Kratzer's contribution on conditionals (and modality ?) on the handbook edited by Wunderlich and von Stechow? It's far more succint than "The Notional ..." Are we just focusing on original work (as opposed to handbook-type) ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kai,</p>
<p>Nice post.</p>
<p>Why not Kratzer&#8217;s contribution on conditionals (and modality ?) on the handbook edited by Wunderlich and von Stechow? It&#8217;s far more succint than &#8220;The Notional &#8230;&#8221; Are we just focusing on original work (as opposed to handbook-type) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai von Fintel</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai von Fintel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-37</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the suggestions, on most of which I completely agree.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But we can't add to the list indefinitely! My idea is that these are the essential readings that a semanticist should read in the first three years of graduate work. On top of that, they will be reading work in other areas and cutting edge work on their generals paper topic and on other specific interests. So, we can't make the list too long. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, I think I will add most of your well-chosen suggestions to my list. (I am somewhat wary of books and dissertations because of their length).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestions, on most of which I completely agree.</p>
<p>But we can&#8217;t add to the list indefinitely! My idea is that these are the essential readings that a semanticist should read in the first three years of graduate work. On top of that, they will be reading work in other areas and cutting edge work on their generals paper topic and on other specific interests. So, we can&#8217;t make the list too long. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, I think I will add most of your well-chosen suggestions to my list. (I am somewhat wary of books and dissertations because of their length).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Potts</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2003 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2003/12/essential-readings-in-semantics#comment-36</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, maybe I live in the burning present along with the physicists: the things that come to mind as potential additions to Kai's preliminary list are all new(ish) and&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(i) beautiful; or 
 (ii) already having a huge impact.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Happily, most have properties (i) and (ii).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CONTEXT-DEPENDENCY
von Fintel, Kai. 1999. NPI licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16(2):97-148.        &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CROSS-LINGUISTIC SEMANTICS
Bittner, Maria. 1994. Cross-linguistic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 17(1):53-108.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;DYNAMICS
Dekker, Paul. 1993. Existential disclosure. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(6):561-587.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;INDEXICALS
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1):29-120.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;INTONATIONAL MEANING
Buering, Daniel. 1999. Topic. In Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, eds., Focus --- Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, 142--165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gunlogson, Christine. 2001. True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. PhD thesis, UC Santa Cruz.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PRESUPPOSITIONS
Beaver, David Ian. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;QUANTIFICATION
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains.
PhD thesis, UMass Amherst.  Published by the GLSA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jacobson, Pauline. 1999. Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2):117-184.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could add to this list indefinitely.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe I live in the burning present along with the physicists: the things that come to mind as potential additions to Kai&#8217;s preliminary list are all new(ish) and</p>
<p>(i) beautiful; or<br />
 (ii) already having a huge impact.  </p>
<p>Happily, most have properties (i) and (ii).</p>
<p>CONTEXT-DEPENDENCY<br />
von Fintel, Kai. 1999. NPI licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16(2):97-148.        </p>
<p>CROSS-LINGUISTIC SEMANTICS<br />
Bittner, Maria. 1994. Cross-linguistic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 17(1):53-108.</p>
<p>DYNAMICS<br />
Dekker, Paul. 1993. Existential disclosure. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(6):561-587.</p>
<p>INDEXICALS<br />
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1):29-120.</p>
<p>INTONATIONAL MEANING<br />
Buering, Daniel. 1999. Topic. In Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, eds., Focus &#8212; Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, 142&#8211;165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p>
<p>Gunlogson, Christine. 2001. True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. PhD thesis, UC Santa Cruz.</p>
<p>PRESUPPOSITIONS<br />
Beaver, David Ian. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI</p>
<p>QUANTIFICATION<br />
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains.<br />
PhD thesis, UMass Amherst.  Published by the GLSA.</p>
<p>Jacobson, Pauline. 1999. Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2):117-184.</p>
<p>I could add to this list indefinitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
