<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geurts on Conditionals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semantics-online.org/2004/07/geurts-on-conditionals/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semantics-online.org/2004/07/geurts-on-conditionals</link>
	<description>A weblog on semantics, pragmatics, philosophy of language, and intersections thereof</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Marmo</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2004/07/geurts-on-conditionals#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Marmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2004/07/geurts-on-conditionals#comment-128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With all due respect, I think that Bart Geurts' paper is still raw. The first pages are too intuitive and his claims are not very explicit. He trusts that the reader will have the same feelings when reading the data. The amount of theoretic devices employed is too small and I would appreciate if he could give us more formalised analyses of the data.
But, of course, this is my humble opinion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, I think that Bart Geurts&#8217; paper is still raw. The first pages are too intuitive and his claims are not very explicit. He trusts that the reader will have the same feelings when reading the data. The amount of theoretic devices employed is too small and I would appreciate if he could give us more formalised analyses of the data.<br />
But, of course, this is my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
