<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kratzer on Indefinites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semantics-online.org/2004/09/kratzer-on-indefinites/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semantics-online.org/2004/09/kratzer-on-indefinites</link>
	<description>A weblog on semantics, pragmatics, philosophy of language, and intersections thereof</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Marmo</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2004/09/kratzer-on-indefinites#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Marmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2004/09/kratzer-on-indefinites#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The importance of this paper by is evident: the discrepancies between &lt;i&gt;natural human&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;artificial logic&lt;/i&gt; languages &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; always illuminating. Particularly, the case of human language &lt;b&gt;indefintes&lt;/b&gt; and their &lt;b&gt;non-direct&lt;/b&gt; correspondence with seemingly equivalent logic quantifiers
has become a column of modern formal semantics, wherefore nowadays students have necessarily to learn this as a basic fact. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kratzer in this paper provides us a very comprehensive picture of this issue, giving the credits to the authors whose work contributed in some manner to this understanding of the phenomena. This is the kind of nice reading that goes well with doughnuts and black tea in one afternoon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is another happy coincidence that I have posted a link to &lt;a href="http://tonymarmo.tripod.com/linguistix-logik/index.blog?entry_id=451472" rel="nofollow"&gt;Kratzer's paper&lt;/a&gt; in my blog. We are all her fans.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importance of this paper by is evident: the discrepancies between <i>natural human</i> and <i>artificial logic</i> languages <b>are</b> always illuminating. Particularly, the case of human language <b>indefintes</b> and their <b>non-direct</b> correspondence with seemingly equivalent logic quantifiers<br />
has become a column of modern formal semantics, wherefore nowadays students have necessarily to learn this as a basic fact. </p>
<p>Kratzer in this paper provides us a very comprehensive picture of this issue, giving the credits to the authors whose work contributed in some manner to this understanding of the phenomena. This is the kind of nice reading that goes well with doughnuts and black tea in one afternoon.</p>
<p>It is another happy coincidence that I have posted a link to <a href="http://tonymarmo.tripod.com/linguistix-logik/index.blog?entry_id=451472" rel="nofollow">Kratzer&#8217;s paper</a> in my blog. We are all her fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
