<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elvis Counterfactual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual</link>
	<description>A weblog on semantics, pragmatics, philosophy of language, and intersections thereof</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, that should be " . . . if he were dead."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that should be &#8221; . . . if he were dead.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-212</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In today's London "Sunday Times" (29 May 2005), there is an article by art critic Bryan Appleyard, critical of the writing of contemporary art critics.  He includes this wonderful sentence:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"John Ruskin, Ernst Grombich and Kenneth Clark must be turning in their graves, as would Robert Hughes if here were dead."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s London &#8220;Sunday Times&#8221; (29 May 2005), there is an article by art critic Bryan Appleyard, critical of the writing of contemporary art critics.  He includes this wonderful sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;John Ruskin, Ernst Grombich and Kenneth Clark must be turning in their graves, as would Robert Hughes if here were dead.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Nathan</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 08:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The last of which is reminiscent of Tom Lehrer's "When Mozart was my age, he had been dead for two years."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And then on a related note, there's Tom Stoppard's line: "I mean, if Beethoven had been killed in a plane crash at twenty-two, the history of music would have been very different. As would the history of aviation, of course."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last of which is reminiscent of Tom Lehrer&#8217;s &#8220;When Mozart was my age, he had been dead for two years.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then on a related note, there&#8217;s Tom Stoppard&#8217;s line: &#8220;I mean, if Beethoven had been killed in a plane crash at twenty-two, the history of music would have been very different. As would the history of aviation, of course.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai von Fintel</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai von Fintel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 23:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Googling for "If Beethoven were alive today" gives three more good ones:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;"If Beethoven were alive today, he would be more famous for his age than his music."&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;"If Beethoven were alive today, he'd probably be clawing at his coffin trying to get out."&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;"If Beethoven were alive today, he would be celebrating the 170th anniversary of his death."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googling for &#8220;If Beethoven were alive today&#8221; gives three more good ones:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;If Beethoven were alive today, he would be more famous for his age than his music.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If Beethoven were alive today, he&#8217;d probably be clawing at his coffin trying to get out.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If Beethoven were alive today, he would be celebrating the 170th anniversary of his death.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 21:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another one in the same line:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"If Beethoven were alive today, he'd be rolling over in his grave."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one in the same line:</p>
<p>&#8220;If Beethoven were alive today, he&#8217;d be rolling over in his grave.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Marmo</title>
		<link>http://semantics-online.org/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Marmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semantics-online.org/wp/uncategorized/2005/05/elvis-counterfactual#comment-208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The comicity effect in both cases is intentional. But besides that effect, they are both examples of how human languages are tolerant to inconsistency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The contradiction in the Elvis' example above points to the idea that the same mechanisms that avoid paradoxical readings also prevent the application of the Principle of Pseudo-Scotus. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One idea, which I would like to develop, is that von Fintel's analysis of counter-factuals can be extended to cases where interpretation is paraconsistent. This reminds me that I have to post my paper on Opacity and ask suggestions to the general audience. (Although people can already post their comments on some parts &lt;a href="http://tonymarmo.tripod.com/linguistix-logik/index.blog?entry_id=1060043" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://tonymarmo.tripod.com/linguistix-logik/index.blog?entry_id=1025334" rel="nofollow"&gt;there&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comicity effect in both cases is intentional. But besides that effect, they are both examples of how human languages are tolerant to inconsistency.</p>
<p>The contradiction in the Elvis&#8217; example above points to the idea that the same mechanisms that avoid paradoxical readings also prevent the application of the Principle of Pseudo-Scotus. </p>
<p>One idea, which I would like to develop, is that von Fintel&#8217;s analysis of counter-factuals can be extended to cases where interpretation is paraconsistent. This reminds me that I have to post my paper on Opacity and ask suggestions to the general audience. (Although people can already post their comments on some parts <a href="http://tonymarmo.tripod.com/linguistix-logik/index.blog?entry_id=1060043" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://tonymarmo.tripod.com/linguistix-logik/index.blog?entry_id=1025334" rel="nofollow">there</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
